How we write
Useful guides start with the real workflow
We test StencilStudio ourselves, use real stencil examples, check official sources when facts can change, and say clearly when the final call belongs to the artist.
Who writes
Andrea Mezzadra
Founder and product builder at StencilStudio
Andrea builds StencilStudio and tests how the tools fit into real stencil prep, using real references and outputs to document what works, what changes, and where artist judgment still matters.
Andrea builds StencilStudio and documents how the product fits into stencil prep. He is not a tattoo artist, so the guides do not pretend to replace professional tattoo judgment.
Product guidance
We check the workflow before we explain it
Product pages and guides should match what an artist can actually do today.
- The feature behaves the way the guide says it does
- Real examples support the point being made
- Web and iPhone features are described separately when needed
- Important limits are visible instead of buried
Changing facts
Official sources first when the answer can change
Licenses, convention details, printer behavior and product specifications can move over time.
When a fact depends on an organizer, regulator, manufacturer or platform, we prefer the current first-party source and show the useful date or link where it matters.
If a detail is not published or cannot be confirmed, we say that instead of filling the gap with a guess.
Professional judgment
The stencil can be prepared here. The tattoo stays yours.
Final size, placement, transfer, hygiene and execution remain professional decisions.
StencilStudio can help with reference cleanup, stencil structure, placement review and print preparation. It does not know the client, the skin, the session or your technique the way the working artist does.
Back to About